Wally delivers an effective associative metaphor:
>A ten-watt lightbulb is brighter than this student.

Gyorgy KoVacuous comes back with this mediocrity:
||And has the same amount of brain as you.

As if quantity=quality. My verbal brilliance is far in excess of what your 
twisted knot of grey enema hose can produce -- ten watts, and getting 
dimmer.

Wally delivers this "great putdown*" | *as described by one Joe Pannonymous
another associative metaphor         |  who has acute perception and astute
                                     |  comprehension of such matters.
>A mule in heat has more eloquence than you.

Gyorgy KoVacuous comes back with more mediocrity:
||The Master answers the child's cries, putting it in a way supposedly 
||understandable by the kid:

Whether you understand it kiddo, matters not a whittle to me.

Gyorgy KoVacuous comes back:
||The only appropriate answer can be:
||False, but it has more brains than you. (Based on your posts.)

> What incredible wit!!! NOT. What a zinger!!! NOT.
> "...it has more brains than you." typical szar-chasm of an elementary 
> school yard -- pre-sophomoronic level. Tsk tsk tsk.
> You have about as much myopic insight into witty come backs as an 
> orrSZARvu in a glass factory.

Gyorgy KoVacuous, who considers everyone on scm to be incredibly stupid, 
feels it is necessary to have to explain the obvious:
||Here is the explanation of Wally's cluelessness: If a statement does not 
||contain any curse words, he can not comprehend it. And you ask for 
||creativity, metaphors and all that jazz! Sourpuss.

Gyorgy KoVacuous's verbal abilities are as common and banal as influenza.
And have the same effect.
Cure: "creativity, metaphors and all that jazz!"
Dr Poetician1 delivers again!

Gyorgy KoVacuous comes back:
||And the only appropoetic answer:
||             ^^^^^^^^^^^\
||                         \ For the new ones: I borrowed that from Wally
||                          \ cause he keeps asking for it.

Poetician1 replies:
> Actually you expoetriated it from Wally.

Gyorgy KoVacuous repeats the same inanity:
||No, I borrowed it from you. You're hallucinating again.

Nope. Borrowing includes consent from the party from which the item was 
borrowed. You neither asked, nor was permission given to you. If you had 
asked I would have consented. Since this fundamental act was not 
accomplished, your act was expoetriation. 


Poetician1 accurately describes Gyorgy"s KoVacuous' verbal virus:
> And you only deliver inappropoetic answers

Gyorgy KoVacuous the prissy prude replies with this witty zinger, NOT:
||I know, I know: no curse words, not good for Wally. I understand.

What Gyorgy KoVacuous' verbalvirus is:
>    DOGGEREL

Gyorgy KoVacuous ludicrously claims:
||Still beats the hell out of your  'Wordscrapers'.

Yet I get my stuff published by third parties whose profession it is to know 
verbal talent when they see it. Regretably, anything Mr KoVacuous produces 
of a verbal nature is destined for the shredder. This is the source of 
KoVacuous' envy and resentment.

Poetician1 enjoys flaunting it in KoVacuous' face:
>The world is weary 
>of the squandering of bandwidth on such crap from one GK 
>who knowingly admits to not being a poet, has never been published by any 
>third party, hasn't a clue about verbal creativity, nor the "associative 
>qualities of true poetry"

And this all that Big Banality KoVacuous could come back with:
||You are obviously clueless about any true poetry yourself.

Obviously. That's why my poetry is published, and why your mediocre theories 
of what is or is not poetry is not published. 

Poetician1 continues to rub it in:
> and finds it excrutiating to be reminded of such 
>from one who has received such authentification as a poet. 

Gyorgy KoVacuous stands there with his fly open:
||Geez, who would that be?

George Faludy, for only one. 
As the children in the kindergarten say: "Na na na na na."

Poetician1 assesses the debris of KoVacuous' vomitus-verbiage.
> So how to grade such trash as GK's doggerel? 
> What about a b-plus?
> No, no, no, that would offer encouragement.
> I think a b-anal would be more appropoetic justice.

KoVomitus III of B-Anality pisses against the hurricane:
||Your creativity is not convincing, so you can quit bragging about it now. 

Now repeat after me:
 I'm published and you're not.
  I'm published and you're not.
   I'm published and you're not.
    I'm published and you're not.
     I'm published and you're not.
      I'm published and you're not.
       I'm published and you're not.
        I'm published and you're not.
         I'm published and you're not.
          I'm published and you're not.
           I'm published and you're not.
            I'm published and you're not.
             I'm published and you're not.
              I'm published and you're not.
               I'm published and you're not.
                I'm published and you're not.
                 I'm published and you're not.
                  I'm published and you're not.
                   I'm published and you're not.
                    I'm published and you're not.
                     I'm published and you're not.
                      I'm published and you're not.
                       I'm published and you're not.
                        I'm published and you're not.
                         I'm published and you're not.
                          I'm published and you're not.
                           I'm published and you're not.
                            I'm published and you're not.
                             I'm published and you're not.
                              I'm published and you're not.
                               I'm published and you're not.
                                I'm published and you're not.
                                 I'm published and you're not.

Tanacsot kerek!

Ha valaki lenne olyan szives kisegiteni egy-ket jo tanccsal. 
Nyolcvan-harom eves nagymamam nem tudja magat megfeleloen ellatni es ezert
ugy dontott, hogy hajlando bekoltozni csalad tagokkal.  A tanacsi lakast
amiben az utobbi 45 evet toltotte el szeretne nevlegesen elcsrelni. 
Termesztesen penz cserere van szuksege. Sajnos mar nincs olyan helyzetben,
hogy ezeket a dolgokat sajat maga el tudja intezni es engem kert meg
segitsegert.  

Mivel nem Magyarorszagon lakom nem vagyok tisztaban mi a leg megfelelob
modszer egy ilyen lakast at adni.  Az informaciot amit meg szeretnek
szerezni eloszor az, hogy milyen keppen a leg biztonsagosabb es a leg
eredmenyesebb meghirdetni egy nevleges cseret.  Masodszor, meg azt
szeretnem megtudni, hogyan lehet egy tanacsi lakasnak az ereteket
megallapitani.

Gondolom ennel mas es fontosabb informaciokra is van szuksegem amivel nem
vagyok tisztaban.  

Minden segitseget elore is es nagyon koszonok.

Karcsi

Legyenek oly szivesek es kuldjek valaszukat az e-mail dobozomba is mert
nics mindig alkalmam, hogy a news-groupokat at nezzem.

A lap a "Nemzet" ingyenes reklamozasakor sajnalatos modon
elfelejtette kozolni, hogy az dijmentesen megrendelheto



utasitassal. "Subject" mezo es leveltorzs tartalom lenyegtelen.

Az ingyen reklam helyesen mutat ra arra, hogy az (egyetlen!)
minden egyes napon megjeleno magyar ujsag a legszelesebb valogatast
adja magyar vonatkozasu (magyar es angol nyelvu) cikkekbol,
a Soros-fele OMRI-tol kezdve, a New York Times-on es 168 Ora-n
valamint Magyar Narancs-on keresztul gyakorlatilag az osszes
hazai naplapbol idez (Magyar Nemzet, Nepszabadsag, Magyar Hirlap,
Vilaggazdasag, Napi Gazdasag, Uj Magyarorszag, Szombat, Uj Ember),
valamint olyan ellenzeki lapokbol is rendszeresen utankozol,
melyeket a M.o.-on duhongo cenzura lelegzethez sem enged
(Demokrata,Magyar Forum, 24. Ora, Kanadai Magyarsag, stb, stb).
A Nemzet-nek levelezesi rovata is van. Ujabban egyre tobb zsido
szarmazasu magyar fejti ki a lapban az SZDSZ politikajanak
kulonosen szamukra tragikus voltat. (Levelek bekuldhetok
nevvel  cimre, nev es minden
azonositotol megtisztitott kozles is lehetseges
 cimre kuldott levellel)

Interested in price .